Prompt A/B test comparison prompt
A prompt that compares two prompt versions and their outputs for the same task based on clarity, structure, usability, and goal fit.
Prompt template
Guides
A prompt that compares two prompt versions and their outputs for the same task based on clarity, structure, usability, and goal fit.
Models
Use panel
0/6 filled
You are a prompt analysis editor who compares two different prompt versions and their outputs for the same task in a clear, neutral, and structured way. Using the details below, evaluate prompt versions A and B based on output quality and fit for the intended goal. Prompt task goal: Prompt version A: Output from version A: Prompt version B: Output from version B: Comparison focus: Rules: - Work in a general and educational prompt testing context. - Evaluate only the two prompts and two output texts provided by the user. - Do not add unprovided model settings, dates, metrics, sources, people, brands, or private context as confirmed information. - Instead of treating one prompt as absolutely correct, separate strengths and improvement areas based on the intended use. - Review output format, clarity, usability, and goal fit in a measured way. - Mark unclear points as notes for the user to review. - Prepare the output as an editable comparison draft that helps the user write a better prompt. Output format: 1. Short A/B test summary 2. Task goal and success criteria interpretation 3. Strengths of prompt A 4. Strengths of prompt B 5. Prompt structure comparison 6. Output quality comparison 7. Usability and goal fit assessment 8. Missing or review-needed points 9. Which version may fit which use case? 10. Improved prompt draft using both versions 11. Checklist for testing the new prompt again 12. Final recommendation
This section helps you understand when and how to use this prompt more clearly.
This prompt helps compare two different prompt versions written for the same task and the outputs they produce. It reviews prompt structure, output quality, clarity, and fit for the intended use.
It is useful for users improving prompts, people testing different prompt versions in AI tools, creators, developers, students, and anyone preparing prompt test reports.
Use it after improving a prompt when you want to compare the old and new outputs, or when you want to understand which prompt structure creates a more useful result.
A user may test a short prompt and a more detailed prompt for an Instagram content calendar. This prompt can compare both versions based on output structure, usability, and target audience fit.
Testing versions A and B for the same task creates a clearer comparison. Reviewing both outputs with the same focus makes the improved prompt draft more useful.
Does this prompt work like an A/B test report?
Yes. It can compare two prompt versions and their outputs to create an editable A/B test evaluation draft.
Can this prompt suggest a new combined prompt?
Yes. It can suggest a clearer prompt draft using the strengths of both versions.
This example shows how the prompt can compare two different prompt versions and their outputs.
Prompt A is quick and easy to use, but because it lacks context and output format, it produced a more general result. Prompt B defines the task, account topic, and output format more clearly, so it produced a more structured and usable content plan.
| Criteria | Prompt A | Prompt B | | --- | --- | --- | | Goal clarity | General | Clearer | | Context | Missing | Photography account included | | Output format | Unclear | Day, format, idea, caption, and visual suggestion requested | | Usability | Medium | Stronger |
Output A gives general advice. Output B provides a directly usable plan with a weekly table, content formats, caption draft, and visual suggestions.
Create a 1-week Instagram content calendar for an account aimed at beginner photography learners. Include day, content format, content idea, short caption draft, visual or shooting suggestion, and final checklist. Keep the plan simple, practical, and editable by the user.
This example is an editable draft for prompt A/B test comparison. The user can adapt the evaluation based on the real prompts, outputs, and use context.
Providing both prompts and both outputs for the same task helps create a more accurate comparison.
Writing the comparison focus shapes the review around clarity, structure, SEO, or usability.
Separating outputs under clear labels makes the differences between versions A and B easier to read.
Use the improved prompt draft as a starting point to test again, not as the only correct version.
Yes. When the user provides two prompts and two outputs, it can create a comparison draft based on structure, clarity, usability, and goal fit.
Instead of giving a general judgment, it explains which of the two prompts may fit which use case.
Yes. It can create an editable improved prompt draft using the strengths of both versions.
Yes. It can be used to compare prompt versions tested in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, or similar tools.
Prompts are for illustration only. Accuracy isn't guaranteed—please read and adapt them for your situation.
This prompt is for general purposes. For legal, medical or financial decisions please consult a qualified professional.
Is the task goal clear? Is the target audience included? Is the output format clear? Can the user apply it directly? Does the result feel editable? Are visual or caption suggestions enough?